The
Crash and Burn Future of Robot Warfare
What
70 Downed Drones Tell Us About the New American Way of War
By Nick
Turse
American fighter
jets screamed over the Iraqi countryside heading for the MQ-1
Predator drone, while its crew in California stood by helplessly.
What had begun as an ordinary reconnaissance mission was now taking a
ruinous turn. In an instant, the jets attacked and then it was
all over. The Predator, one of the Air Force’s workhorse
hunter/killer robots, had been obliterated.
An account of the
spectacular end of that nearly $4 million drone in November 2007 is
contained in a collection of Air Force accident investigation
documents recently examined by TomDispatch. They catalog more
than 70 catastrophic Air Force drone mishaps since 2000, each
resulting in the loss of an aircraft or property damage of $2 million
or more.
These official
reports, some obtained by TomDispatch through the Freedom of
Information Act, offer new insights into a largely covert, yet highly
touted war-fighting, assassination, and spy program involving armed
robots that are significantly less reliable than previously
acknowledged. These planes, the latest wonder weapons in the
U.S. military arsenal, are tested, launched, and piloted from a
shadowy network of more than 60
bases spread around the globe, often in support of elite
teams of special operations forces. Collectively, the Air
Force documents offer a remarkable portrait of modern drone warfare,
one rarely found in a decade of generally triumphalist
or awestruck press accounts that seldom mention the limitations
of drones, much less their mission
failures.
The aerial disasters
described draw attention not only to the technical limitations of
drone warfare, but to larger conceptual flaws inherent in such
operations. Launched and landed by aircrews close to
battlefields in places like Afghanistan, the drones are controlled
during missions by pilots and sensor operators -- often multiple
teams over many hours -- from bases in places like Nevada and North
Dakota. They are sometimes also monitored by “screeners”
from private security contractors at stateside bases like Hurlburt
Field in Florida. (A recent McClatchy report revealed
that it takes nearly 170 people to keep a single Predator in the air
for 24 hours.)
In other words,
drone missions, like the robots themselves, have many moving parts
and much, it turns out, can and does go wrong. In that November
2007 Predator incident in Iraq, for instance, an electronic failure
caused the robotic aircraft to engage its self-destruct mechanism and
crash, after which U.S. jets destroyed the wreckage to prevent it
from falling into enemy hands. In other cases, drones --
officially known as remotely piloted aircraft, or RPAs -- broke down,
escaped human control and oversight, or self-destructed for reasons
ranging from pilot error and bad weather to mechanical failure in
Afghanistan, Djibouti, the Gulf of Aden, Iraq, Kuwait, and various
other unspecified or classified foreign locations, as well as in the
United States.
In 2001, Air Force
Predator drones flew 7,500 hours. By the close of last year,
that number topped 70,000. As the tempo
of robotic air operations has steadily increased, crashes have, not
surprisingly, become more frequent. In 2001, just two Air Force
drones were destroyed in accidents. In 2008, eight drones fell
from the sky. Last year, the number reached 13. (Accident
rates are, however, dropping according to an Air Force report
relying on figures from 2009.)
Keep in mind that
the 70-plus accidents recorded in those Air Force documents represent
only drone crashes investigated by the Air Force under a rigid set of
rules. Many other drone mishaps have not been included in the Air
Force statistics. Examples include a haywire
MQ-9 Reaper drone that had to be shot out of the Afghan skies by
a fighter jet in 2009, a remotely-operated Navy helicopter that went
down in Libya last June, an unmanned aerial vehicle whose camera was
reportedly taken by Afghan insurgents after a crash in August 2011,
an advanced RQ-170
Sentinel lost during a spy mission in Iran last December, and the
recent
crash of an MQ-9 Reaper in the Seychelles Islands.
You Don’t
Need a Weatherman... Or Do You?
How missions are
carried out -- and sometimes fail -- is apparent from the
declassified reports, including one provided to TomDispatch by the
Air Force detailing a June 2011 crash. Late that month, a
Predator drone took off from Jalalabad Air Base in Afghanistan to
carry out a surveillance mission in support of ground forces.
Piloted by a member of the 432nd Air Expeditionary Wing out of
Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, the robotic craft ran into rough
weather, causing the pilot to ask for permission to abandon the
troops below.
His commander never
had a chance to respond. Lacking weather avoidance equipment
found on more sophisticated aircraft or on-board sensors to clue the
pilot in to rapidly deteriorating weather conditions, and with a
sandstorm interfering with ground radar, “severe weather
effects” overtook the Predator. In an instant, the
satellite link between pilot and plane was severed. When it
momentarily flickered back to life, the crew could see that the drone
was in an extreme nosedive. They then lost the datalink for a
second and final time. A few minutes later, troops on the
ground radioed in to say that the $4 million drone had crashed near
them.
A month earlier, a
Predator drone took off from the tiny African nation of Djibouti in
support of Operation Enduring Freedom, which includes operations
in Afghanistan as well as Yemen, Djibouti, and Somalia, among other
nations. According to documents obtained via the Freedom of
Information Act, about eight hours into the flight, the mission crew
noticed a slow oil leak. Ten hours later, they handed the drone
off to a local aircrew whose assignment was to land it at Djibouti’s
Ambouli Airport, a joint civilian/military facility adjacent to Camp
Lemonier, a U.S. base in the country.
That mission crew --
both the pilot and sensor operator -- had been deployed from Creech
Air Force Base in Nevada and had logged a combined 1,700 hours flying
Predators. They were considered “experienced” by
the Air Force. On this day, however, the electronic sensors
that measure their drone’s altitude were inaccurate, while low
clouds and high humidity affected its infrared sensors and set the
stage for disaster.
An
investigation eventually found that, had the crew performed proper
instrument cross-checks, they would have noticed a 300-400 foot
discrepancy in their altitude. Instead, only when the RPA broke
through the clouds did the sensor operator realize just how close to
the ground it was. Six seconds later, the drone crashed to
earth, destroying itself and one of its Hellfire missiles.
Storms, clouds,
humidity, and human error aren’t the only natural dangers for
drones. In a November 2008 incident, a mission crew at Kandahar
Air Field launched a Predator on a windy day. Just five
minutes into the flight, with the aircraft still above the sprawling
American mega-base, the pilot realized that the plane had already
deviated from its intended course. To get it back on track, he
initiated a turn that -- due to the aggressive nature of the
maneuver, wind conditions, drone design, and the unbalanced weight of
a missile on just one wing -- sent the plane into a roll. Despite the
pilot's best efforts, the craft entered a tailspin, crashed on the
base, and burst into flames.
Going Rogue
On occasion, RPAs
have simply escaped from human control. Over the course of
eight hours on a late February day in 2009, for example, five
different crews passed off the controls of a Predator drone, one to
the next, as it flew over Iraq. Suddenly, without warning, the
last of them, members of the North Dakota Air National Guard at
Hector International Airport in Fargo, lost communication with the
plane. At that point no one -- not the pilot, nor the sensor
operator, nor a local mission crew -- knew where the drone was or
what it was doing. Neither transmitting nor receiving data or
commands, it had, in effect, gone rogue. Only later was it
determined that a datalink failure had triggered the drone’s
self-destruct mechanism, sending it into an unrecoverable tailspin
and crash within 10 minutes of escaping human control.
In November 2009, a
Predator launched from Kandahar Air Field in Afghanistan lost touch
with its human handlers 20 minutes after takeoff and simply
disappeared. When the mission crew was unable to raise the
drone, datalink specialists were brought in but failed to find the
errant plane. Meanwhile, air traffic controllers, who had lost
the plane on radar, could not even locate its transponder signal.
Numerous efforts to make contact failed. Two days later, at the
moment the drone would have run out of fuel, the Air Force declared
the Predator “lost.” It took eight days for its
wreckage to be located.
Crash Course
In mid-August 2004,
while drone operations in the Central Command (CENTCOM) area of
responsibility were running at high tempo, a Predator mission crew
began hearing a cascade of warning alarms indicating engine and
alternator failure, as well as a possible engine fire. When the
sensor operator used his camera to scan the aircraft, it didn’t
take long to spot the problem. Its tail had burst into flames.
Shortly afterward, it became uncontrollable and crashed.
In January 2007, a
Predator drone was flying somewhere in the CENTCOM region (above one
of 20 countries in the Greater Middle East). About 14 hours
into a 20-hour mission, the aircraft began to falter. For
15 minutes its engine was failing, but the information it was sending
back remained within normal parameters, so the mission crew failed to
notice. Only at the last minute did they become aware that
their drone was dying. As an investigation later determined, an
expanding crack in the drone’s crankshaft caused the engine to
seize up. The pilot put the aircraft into a glide toward an
unpopulated area. Higher headquarters then directed that he
should intentionally crash it, since a rapid reaction force would not
be able to reach it quickly and it was carrying two Hellfire missiles
as well as unspecified “classified equipment.” Days
later, its remains were recovered.
The Crash
and Burn Future of Robot Warfare
In spite of all the
technical limitations of remote-controlled war spelled out in the Air
Force investigation files, the U.S. is doubling down on drones.
Under the president’s new
military strategy, the Air Force is projected to see its share of
the budgetary pie rise and flying robots are expected
to be a major part of that expansion.
Already, counting
the Army’s thousands of tiny drones, one in three military
aircraft -- close
to 7,500 machines -- are robots. According to official
figures provided to TomDispatch, roughly 285 of them are Air Force
Predator, Reaper, or Global Hawk drones. The Air Force's
arsenal also includes more advanced Sentinels,
Avengers,
and other classified unmanned aircraft.
A report
published by the Congressional Budget Office last year, revealed that
“the Department of Defense plans to purchase about 730 new
medium-sized and large unmanned aircraft systems” during the
next 10 years.
Over the last
decade, the United States has increasingly turned to drones in an
effort to win its wars. The Air Force investigation files
examined by TomDispatch suggest a more extensive use of drones in
Iraq than has previously been reported. But in Iraq, as in
Afghanistan, America’s preeminent wonder weapon failed to bring
the U.S. mission anywhere close to victory. Effective as the
spearhead of a program to cripple
al-Qaeda in Pakistan, drone warfare in that country’s tribal
borderlands has also alienated
almost the entire population of 190
million. In other words, an estimated 2,000 suspected
or identified guerrillas (as well as untold numbers of civilians)
died. The populace of a key American ally grew ever more
hostile and no one knows how many new militants in search of revenge
the drone strikes may have created,
though the numbers are believed to be significant.
Despite a decade of
technological, tactical, and strategic refinements and improvements,
Air Force and allied CIA personnel watching computer monitors in
distant locations have continually
failed to discriminate between armed combatants and innocent
civilians and, as a result, the judge-jury-executioner drone
assassination program is widely considered to have run afoul of
international law.
In addition, drone
warfare seems to be creating a sinister system of embedded economic
incentives that may lead to increasing casualty figures on the
ground. “In some targeting programs, staffers have review
quotas -- that is, they must review a certain number of possible
targets per given length of time,” The
Atlantic’s
Joshua Foust recently
wrote of the private contractors involved in the process.
“Because they are contractors,” he explains, “their
continued employment depends on their ability to satisfy the stated
performance metrics. So they have a financial incentive to make
life-or-death decisions about possible kill targets just to stay
employed. This should be an intolerable situation, but because the
system lacks transparency or outside review it is almost impossible
to monitor or alter.”
As flight hours rise
year by year, these stark drawbacks are compounded by a series of
technical glitches and vulnerabilities that are ever more regularly
coming to light. These include: Iraqi insurgents hacking drone
video feeds, a virulent computer virus infecting the Air Force’s
unmanned fleet, large percentages of drone pilots suffering
from "high operational stress," a friendly
fire incident in which drone operators killed two U.S. military
personnel, increasing numbers of crashes, and the possibility of an
Iranian drone-hijacking,
as well as those more than 70 catastrophic mishaps detailed in Air
Force accident investigation documents.
Over the last
decade, a more-is-better mentality has led to increased
numbers of drones, drone
bases, drone pilots, and drone victims, but not much else.
Drones may be effective in terms of generating body counts, but they
appear to be even more successful in generating animosity and
creating enemies.
The Air Force’s
accident reports are replete with evidence of the flaws inherent in
drone technology, and there can be little doubt that, in the future,
ever more will come to light. A decade’s worth of
futility
suggests that drone warfare itself may already be crashing and
burning, yet it seems destined that the skies will fill with drones
and that the future will bring more of the same.
Nick Turse is
the associate editor of TomDispatch.com. An award-winning
journalist, his work has appeared in the Los
Angeles Times, the
Nation, and
regularly
at TomDispatch.
This article is the fifth in his new
series on the changing face of American empire, which is being
underwritten by Lannan Foundation.
You can follow him on Twitter @NickTurse,
on Tumblr, and on
Facebook. (To listen
to Timothy MacBain’s latest Tomcast audio interview in which
Turse discusses why drone warfare is anything but failure-proof,
click here,
or download it to your iPod here.)
Copyright 2012 Nick
Turse
This article appeared originally at TomDispatch.com - without the image.
Home